WYE MILLS PLAN DEFEATED!
On October 8, 2009 the Queen Anne’s County Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-2 against the proposed Wye Mills Plan.The plan called for 1 Million square feet of commecial development. The Maryland Department of Planning, Talbot County and Caroline County all opposed the plan. Queen Anne's Conservation, ESLC, Chesapeake Wildlife Heritage, Talbot Preservation Alliance, Friends of Wye River, and others all opposed the plan as well. Collectively, everyone's efforts made the difference. Thank you to everyone who sent in an email, made a call to the Planning Commission, or wrote a letter. Your efforts on this matter made all the difference!
» Wye Mills Community Plan
March 27th of 2008, Queen Anne’s County formed a Citizens Advisory Committee for the purpose of recommending new zoning for acreage at the intersection of Routes 213 and 50, dubbed “The Wye Mills Community Plan”.
Why should you care? Traffic, traffic, traffic, and the further degredation of the Wye River. For a more in-depth story on how this all came to be, read more»
A Town Meeting was held on Monday Sept. 21st. Info regarding this meeting will be posted soon. The Michaels Development Corporation & Talbot County Housing Authority will presented information about a proposed high density development on Port St. on the site of WCEI radio. The housing (workforce, Section 8 and low income senior housing) would be a mix of garden units & townhouses. PROPOSED # of UNITS - 202 ACREAGE 10.9 ACRES A crucial financial component for the senior housing would be a financial commitment from the Town of Easton of $1.4 Million over a period of 2-3 years. While the proposed plan would meet Easton’s goal for ‘infill’ development ( building within the Town rather than sprawling out) the traffic, tax and extreme density raise serious questions.
» EASTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
» UPDATE » On Thursday October 15th, Easton P&Z is slated to review and no doubtedly pass the Easton Comprehensive Plan. We (TPA) will then go over the draft with a fine tooth comb and will be posting points shortly, so we can start to rally the troops for the Town Council review.
The Easton Comprehensive Plan process is not quite complete, as the Town Council still needs to vote, hopefully this fall, but there is some good news now!
Rocks and Rauch, Easton Club East developers who had purchased adjacent property, have sold that property back to Mr. Brooks, the farmer who sold it to them some time ago. The significance of this action is that unrelenting citizen opposition to rapid residential growth made it clear to them that more homes in that area would not be allowed in the near future.
So, THANK YOU for appearing at hearings, speaking up and writing letters. It made a positive difference!
DRAFT CONCERNS: Although perhaps 100 citizens attended biweekly meetings to give input, and many more answered on-line survey questions, much of this input was ignored! WHY???
• In last year’s survey questions eleven and twelve regarding annexation priorities, the majority of respondents indicated that they liked the current three tiered system best, yet this disappeared from the current draft, and now priorities two and three are merged into one big category called “Future Growth Area”. The citizens clearly indicated that they want the current priority system. This change is unacceptable! The Planning Staff should change the draft to reflect the wishes of the people it serves.
• In an early meeting on the comp plan last year, the question was asked of the 50+ citizen attendees if they opposed more annexation/growth. Literally all hands went up. The merge of priorities 2 and 3 into “Future Growth Area” has the potential of speeding up growth/annexation because larger portions can be annexed/developed sooner. The citizens clearly indicated they are against this. Again, unacceptable since it does not reflect overwhelming citizen sentiment! It should be changed to do so.
• In addition, the survey, in question three, asked about the ideal population for Easton. 72% said it is just about right as is. Unacceptable again; the draft fosters growth at a rapid pace. A change in the draft is required!
• There is, within the town right now, enough land available to build 2673 dwelling units (chart p. 53) which would raise our population by 40%. Why does the draft facilitate quicker and larger annexations, again ignoring citizen input? It must be changed!
And what about sewer capacity for the Hospital?
We must reserve adequate wastewater capacity for the needs of the new hospital campus near the Community Center. The thirty permitted uses of the proposed hospital complex will need a lot of wastewater capacity, yet already possible residential and business uses could use up to 50% of Easton’s remaining wastewater capacity. Easton has run out of wastewater capacity before. Let’s not overbuild now and risk losing our hospital in the future.
Concerned about these issues? Write to the Planning and Zoning Commission:
John Atwood, Chairman: atwood@goeaston.net
Linda Cheezum: lcheezum@talbot-bank.com
Tom Moore: tommore@goeaston.net
Steve Periconi: periconi@yahoo.com
Dan Swann: dapper@goeaston.net
» Easton Comprehensive Plan
State-mandated reviews of Comprehensive Plans are required of all counties and municipalities every six years. Easton is now undergoing its Comp Plan review, likely a year long process to be completed in late winter or early spring 2009. Comp Plans provide the underlying guidelines for zoning and other policies, and are often cited in courts of law. To gather state-required public input, there have been three meetings on growth and three on transportation. These two chapters of the Comp Plan are of most general interest to the public. It is unclear whether more public meetings will take place and on what subjects. Read more»
Village Green: Federal Stimulus Threatened to Overrun Small Town with Sprawl
by F. Kaid Benfield - The Huffington Post May 15, 2009
Just last week, my NRDC colleague Nancy Stoner pointed out that the federal program that provides water infrastructure to local communities is essentially subsidizing sprawl. This is because the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (an atrocious name if I've ever heard one) "continues to fund new sewage treatment plants and new sewage and stormwater collection systems in greenfields, i.e., currently undeveloped or working landscapes." Read more »
Missed the program "Poisoned Waters"? Click here to view the broadcast from April 21st.
Maryland Public Television and WETA aired a two-hour Frontline presentation, which featured the Chesapeake Bay. Poisoned Waters examines the scope, causes, and implications of our polluted waterways. But there's a glimmer of hope as well.
To View an excerpt of the program, "Bay In Trouble: The Manure Problem" click here
Published: Friday, February 20, in the Star Democrat
In Wednesday's Star, a local political group alleges that an expansion of Talbot County's shoreline buffer, from 25 to 60 feet, would be a "taking ... without any scientific evidence that [it] would have any positive effect on water quality." Read more»
Shoreline buffers needed in Talbot
By TOM HUGHES Guest Comment
Published: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:53 AM CST
There have been several offerings in this newspaper recently concerning the shoreline buffer issue, which have been comprised mostly of misinformation and misdirection. Having worked on this issue for more than seven years, I will try to set the record straight. Read more »
» Bailout for Trappe East Developer?
The President of the Trappe Town Council, Don English, has submitted an application for $18,000,000 in federal stimulus funding for a new wastewater treatment plant that would serve a huge new development in farm fields across Route 50—but not one current Trappe resident. Counter to the objectives of stimulus funding, this money would not create new jobs, it would merely substitute our taxpayer dollars for those of the developer. Read more »
Trappe East Developments & Information
With the potential infusion of federal stimulus funds, Trappe East has in recent months moved to the forefront of controversy. Read the Trappe East Overview for more information
» Scientists Say Bay Program A Failure
Twenty-five years after the launch of the Chesapeake Bay Program, a distinguished group of scientists and activists have labeled it a failure. They state that the Clean Water Act has not been enforced, and the Chesapeake Bay Agreement has not been obeyed. The group is calling for more aggressive, mandatory actions to reduce pollution. Read more
» Easton Appeals Board Rejects Parking Lot in Stream Buffer
On January 13, 2009 the Town of Easton’s Board of Zoning Appeals rejected a request to build a parking lot within Easton’s 100 perennial stream buffer, one of the first challenges to the buffer since it was established in May 2008. TPA presented evidence at the hearing urging the Board to deny the variance. Read more»
» Eastern Shore Residents Concerned About Sprawl, Growth
Latest Public Opinion Poll Results Released
Eastern Shore Land Conservancy (ESLC) today announced the results of a poll indicating growth, development and sprawl continue to be a top concern for Eastern Shore residents.
The poll indicates that residents feel the single most important problem facing the Eastern Shore is growth, development and sprawl. This is followed by a 2:1 margin by a tie between jobs/economy and the environment/community. This number of residents most concerned about growth and development issues is highest in Queen Anne’s and Talbot.
"This poll tells us that growth issues continue to be a top concern of Eastern Shore residents and that the public is looking to local elected officials for solutions ," said Amy Owsley, ESLC’s Director of Land Use Planning. Eastern Shore Land Conservancy Survey Results continues here
» Miles Point / Midland Development (St. Michaels)
In 1998, the Midland Companies first introduced plans for intensively developing two parcels (72 acres with St. Michaels and 17 in the county) to include over 300 residences, a hotel, and 18,000 square feet of retail space. Although the St. Michaels Commissioners initially rejected the request, they began reversing themselves in late 2003 when they annexed the 17-acre “Hunteman” parcel. (A coalition of concerned neighbors and eight local grass-roots organizations challenged the legality of that annexation, which was subsequently overturned in Talbot County Circuit Court.) Read more»
Bay advocates call for more aggressive efforts
25th anniversary of formal launch of restoration agreement is tomorrow
By Timothy B. Wheeler - Baltimore Sun
December 8, 2008
**Read the follow up to this article here
A group of scientists and advocates called today for new, more aggressive efforts to restore the bay, saying the current approach has not worked and the troubled estuary is declining, not improving.
The group -- more than a dozen scientists, policy specialists and activists -- presented its recommendations to the head of the Environmental Protection Agency's bay program office in Annapolis on the eve of the 25th anniversary of the formal launch of the bay restoration effort.
"We believe the voluntary and collaborative approach we have had in place has simply not worked," said Walter Boynton, a veteran scientist with the University of Maryland's Chesapeake Bay laboratory in Solomons.
In a statement, the group said that population growth and development have overwhelmed cleanup progress. Water quality is declining in much of the bay, rather than improving, the statement pointed out.
The group called for "mandatory, enforceable measures" to reduce nutrient, sediment and toxic pollution, including new land-use legislation and tougher regulation of farms. It also urged the bay states to formally adopt a policy barring any further net losses of forest and wetlands.
Other members of the group include William C. Dennison, a vice president at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science in Cambridge; Howard Ernst, a bay advocate and associate professor of political science at the Naval Academy; and Robert J. Etgen, executive director of the Eastern Shore Land Conservancy.
Jeff Lape, director of the EPA's bay program, said that bay state governors and federal officials have acknowledged the lack of progress in bay restoration. "There has been a lot of good work for bay restoration," he said. "Despite that work, the bay's health is not anywhere near where it needs to be." He pledged to work "in partnership" to find new strategies to get the job done.
The group's statement was drafted after an all-day meeting in Annapolis last week organized by Gerald Winegrad, a former legislator and outspoken bay advocate. He and several others endorsing the statement were present when the first bay restoration agreement was signed Dec. 9, 1983.
Bay-state governors and federal officials have acknowledged that they will not achieve their pollution reduction goals by 2010. It is the second deadline the restoration effort has missed for cleaning up nutrient pollution. At a meeting this month, they pledged to set short-term cleanup goals and an ultimate deadline for restoring the bay.
» The story of Trappe East or The Mouse that Roared
In 2003, the tiny town of Trappe voted to annex 924 acres of land across Route 50 to permit 2501 homes to be built. Those who voted in favor of the annexation believed that the 5,384 new residents’ tax revenues would lift them out of their water and sewer debt, and that the development would bring much desired commercial establishments to their town. What has happened since then? Read more»
TPA Statement on Recent Shore Health System Decision
Over the past 18 months TPA has been a relentless public advocate for the selection of land adjacent to Easton, made available to Shore Health System by the Talbot County Council, as the site for a proposed new regional medical center. We commissioned a professionally produced video documenting the history of the hospital’s close relationship with our community and offered this as part of a program presented to a packed house at the Avalon Theater. The video highlighted the geographic superiority of the County’s proposed site, and documented the devastating financial effect of a potential relocation of our hospital to a site at Routes 50 and 404.
With the help of a volunteer citizens’ committee, we organized a petition drive that accumulated 10,043 signatures, presented to the Board of the University of Maryland Medical System (which owns SHS), documenting the widespread local support for location of the new hospital at the County Council site. Read more»
TPA says keep the hospital in Easton
Guest Comment by Eileen A. Deymier
Vice President, Talbot Preservation Alliance
Printed on 10/23/2008 Star Democrat
The Commissioners of Queen Anne's and Caroline County recently wrote to the Interim CEO of the University of Maryland Medical System endorsing a new regional medical center and urging a "centrally located and accessible" site, chosed "based on logic, not local political interests." We agree. This, however, does not mean that a logistical, accessible site would be at the intersections of either Routes 50 and 213 or 404.
For 100 years, Memorial Hospital at Easton has served as the regional medical center for the Mid-Shore. A new facility in or on the northern edge of Easton will continue to best serve the region as a whole. Read more» |